Psychosomatics
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychosomatics 48:426-432, September-October
doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.48.5.426
© 2007 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Sherman, A. C.
* Articles by Simonton, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Sherman, A. C.
* Articles by Simonton, S.
Related Collections
* Depression
* Syndromes Secondary to General Medical Disorders

Patient Preferences Regarding Cancer Group Psychotherapy Interventions: A View From the Inside

Allen C. Sherman, Ph.D., Jaymie Pennington, M.D., Umaira Latif, M.Sc., Harriet Farley, L.C.S.W., Lenore Arent, L.C.S.W., and Stephanie Simonton, Ph.D.

Received March 31, 2006; revised June 5, 2006; accepted July 6, 2006. From the Dept. of Behavioral Medicine, the Dept. of Social Work, and the Dept. of Internal Medicine, AR Cancer Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR. Send correspondence and reprint requests to Allen C. Sherman, Ph.D., Behavioral Medicine, #756, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR. e-mail: ShermanAllenC{at}uams.edu
© 2007 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine

Group interventions for cancer patients have commanded notable interest among investigators, but utilization rates are low and little is known about the features that patients themselves deem most important. The authors examined the views of potential participants, among 425 patients with diverse malignancies. A large number (64.6%) expressed interest, although few had attended a group. Preferences were strongest for interventions convened during diagnostic or active treatment periods rather than later, and those focusing on medical education or health-promotion, rather than emotional support or coping. Most were amenable to drop-in formats and to heterogeneous membership. In subgroup analyses, preferences were associated with disease site and not strongly related to psychosocial or demographic predictors. Understanding patient preferences may be critical for successful program development and utilization.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org