Psychosomatics
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychosomatics 47:325-329, August 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.47.4.325
© 2006 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kim, S. Y.H.
* Articles by Appelbaum, P. S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kim, S. Y.H.
* Articles by Appelbaum, P. S.
Related Collections
* Diagnostic Criteria
* Interviews

Do Clinicians Follow a Risk-Sensitive Model of Capacity-Determination? An Experimental Video Survey

Scott Y.H. Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Eric D. Caine, M.D., Jeffrey G. Swan, M.A., and Paul S. Appelbaum, M.D.

Received July 12, 2005; revised October 17, 2005; accepted October 20, 2005. From the Dept. of Psychiatry, the Bioethics Program, and the Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Univ. of Michigan; the Dept. of Psychiatry, Univ. of Rochester; and the Dept. of Psychiatry, Columbia Univ. Medical School. Send correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kim, 300 North Ingalls St., 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0429. e-mail: scottkim{at}umich.edu

The authors asked whether clinicians use a risk-sensitive model for decisional-capacity determinations; that is, whether a higher degree of capacity was required in higher-risk situations. The respondents were randomly assigned to view a videotaped "capacity" interview of a medication-randomized clinical trial scenario (N=52) or a neurosurgical clinical trial scenario (N=47). A significant scenario effect was mediated by the respondents’ perception of scenario-specific risk. Respondents showed considerable disagreement within each scenario that was not explained by clinician-specific factors. Thus, clinicians, in fact, use the normative risk-sensitive model for capacity, but there remains considerable unexplained variability in their judgments.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJGPHome page
J. Karlawish, S. Y. H. Kim, D. Knopman, C. H. van Dyck, B. D. James, and D. Marson
Interpreting the Clinical Significance of Capacity Scores for Informed Consent in Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 16(7): 568 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
D. V. Jeste, B. W. Palmer, S. Golshan, L. T. Eyler, L. B. Dunn, T. Meeks, D. Glorioso, I. Fellows, H. Kraemer, and P. S. Appelbaum
Multimedia Consent for Research in People With Schizophrenia and Normal Subjects: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Schizophr Bull, January 31, 2008; (2008) sbm148v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org