Psychosomatics
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by De Gucht, V.
* Articles by Fischler, B.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by De Gucht, V.
* Articles by Fischler, B.
Related Collections
* Somatoform Disorders
Psychosomatics 43:1-9, February 2002
© 2002 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine


Review

Somatization: A Critical Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues

Véronique De Gucht, Ph.D., and Benjamin Fischler, M.D., Ph.D.

Received May 9, 2001; revised October 12, 2001; accepted October 25, 2001. From the Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, and the Department of Liaison Psychiatry, University Hospital of Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. De Gucht, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, P.O. Box 9555, 2300RB Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: veronique.degucht{at}belgacom.net

Despite its apparent clinical importance and the extensive research that has been conducted in the past decades, somatization remains a complex concept. Two distinct ways of looking at somatization can be distinguished: somatization as a phenomenon that is secondary to psychological distress (presenting somatization) and somatization as a primary phenomenon characterized by medically unexplained symptoms (functional somatization). The literature was analyzed in terms of this distinction and a selective review was conducted, focusing on a critical analysis of conceptual and methodological issues related to presenting and functional somatization. A number of measurement issues related to somatization in general were also highlighted. On the basis of the available data, the strengths and weaknesses of different concepts are pointed out. Conclusions are formulated regarding which concepts or approaches might be useful both clinically and from a research perspective. Finally, a number of suggestions for future research are offered.

Key Words: Somatization • Assessment • Medically Unexplained Issues




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
R. Noyes Jr., S. P. Stuart, and D. B. Watson
A Reconceptualization of the Somatoform Disorders
Psychosomatics, February 1, 2008; 49(1): 14 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
K. Kroenke, M. Sharpe, and R. Sykes
Revising the Classification of Somatoform Disorders: Key Questions and Preliminary Recommendations
Psychosomatics, August 1, 2007; 48(4): 277 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Sharpe and R. Mayou
Somatoform disorders: a help or hindrance to good patient care?
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 184(6): 465 - 467.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
R. Mayou, J. Levenson, and M. Sharpe
Somatoform Disorders in DSM-V
Psychosomatics, December 1, 2003; 44(6): 449 - 451.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org